It's 9am, and, already, my cognitive capacity for the day has been exhausted. "Marge, cancel all of the rest of my decisions for the day".
Dangerous 1Aپیش 18 ساعت
Just realised that this guy is from "You Have Been Warned"
Joe Piazzaپیش 18 ساعت
Just writing out 3^3^3^3 would take about 100,000 years non stop assuming it takes almost a full second on average to write a digit.
The Xetriusپیش 18 ساعت
5:00 (uncorrected initial thought) The geometric logic doesnt seem to indicate and amount but the fase of a process. • single powdered ingredient •• combined powdered ingredients ● mixed mass (Bowl up) mixed wet-mass (Bowl left) clean, dry-mass, water (Bowl left ●) dirty, wet mass, mixing bowl Is there physical proof of the volume to symbol correlation? 6:16 the tablet is on it's side as indicate by the horizon line on the left you can see the grain mill on the right you see input at the bottom and it's product at the top giving new insight to the symbolic meaning that it is about the different grains sizes and residue that they ended up with. The bowls are not sideways, the tablet is so I have to correct for the geometric logic that I interpreted @5:00 in the new context • single unit •• demand expressed in single units ● valued product, large production mass (Bowl right) empty bowl mass (Bowl up) residual mass + bowl (Bowl up ●) valued product mass+bowl It's read from horizon left (processing plant) to the right, and from the horizon up (to the son/sun) It shows an empty bowl being filled with six milling units. 3 milling units are set aside for every 8 bowls milled for his own family to eat in trade for the work of handling the bowls. 6:47 the first symbol is a grain silo, the second is the mill house the diamond is his family house and left of the one (video bottom left - real upper left) is the mechanical grinder. I think this is actually the inventor/creator claiming the invention. And getting his share for the public use. From this we could tel that there where 8 families consisting of 2 adults and a child adding to a community of 24 mouths to feed (if done honestly)
Felipe Mendes de Holanda Linsپیش 19 ساعت
What about air resistance?
John Allsupپیش 19 ساعت
(Writing this at 1:22 -- haven't watched the entire thing yet.) Re-roll unless at least two dice agree. If two or more dice agree, take what they show.
Barna Kپیش 19 ساعت
Imagine all the engineers being confused why 3 isn't an integer
the_foeپیش 19 ساعت
just easter egg
Eli Bپیش 19 ساعت
WTF??!!?!?!? 4TH?
Nyll REپیش 19 ساعت
whatever the heck I just watched I like it
Santiago Cabelloپیش 19 ساعت
Jajajajjaj pito pito pito
dirtywashedupsparkleپیش 19 ساعت
Fascinating game, genius build, guarantees breakage, given WE NEVER WIN. Still genius.
Warren Smithپیش 19 ساعت
"It's a kind of -- I don't know, what is it? -- It's the average of the squares?": The word you are looking for is "Root mean square." A very common concept in engineering. Abbreviated "RMS".
ralph stricker-chapmanپیش 19 ساعت
For the record, I did bat an eye when I saw e and ln(2) listed side-by-side among the transcendentals.
Saturated Odinپیش 19 ساعت
Why not leave the dice glued boom 2 dice
WetBadgerپیش 19 ساعت
You'll never get anywhere trying to square a circle
Annonimoose Qپیش 19 ساعت
The effect looks like what happens when I play with tangents on desmos for too long
Dilip K Nپیش 19 ساعت
Good try 👍
ruolbuپیش 19 ساعت
But it's (500 million💵➗327 million🚶♂️) So it becomes (500 million➗327 million) for the numeric value AND (💵➗🚶♂️) for the unit And it ends with 1.529(💵➗🚶♂️) not just 1.529💵 :p
Tod Wiseپیش 19 ساعت
Jesus hates you
svend-erik Krum-Møllerپیش 20 ساعت
e=3 Hmm this calculation seems to be more Engineering than physics.
Maria Hernandezپیش 20 ساعت
>be me >solve a complicated maths problem
Rich Galanteپیش 20 ساعت
Eyy pyraminxes in the background!
Trias00پیش 20 ساعت
Pirate Princess Petunia, your name is awesome.
Ethan Jensenپیش 20 ساعت
It's a parker conjecture
NebelHoseپیش 20 ساعت
Algorithm
David Elliottپیش 20 ساعت
So this is how Superman’s Fortress of Solitude was made...
KevinYSCپیش 20 ساعت
Wait, can you tell me first if pi^pi^pi^pi is ((pi^pi)^pi)^pi or pi^(pi^(pi^pi)) Because I tried using MATLAB and it says ((pi^pi)^pi)^pi = 2.5988e+15 and pi^(pi^(pi^pi)) is so large that it just says it's inf
KevinYSCپیش 20 ساعت
Oh I unpaused the video and saw that it's pi^(pi^(pi^pi)), nvm
Tail_Recursionپیش 20 ساعت
Tail Recursion is its own reward.
Minzeپیش 21 ساعت
Platform 0 is clearly superior to 9¾
Ty Hayterپیش 21 ساعت
Lel, the 4.6K that disliked this vid are probably Trump supporters who barely know how to count
jffryhپیش 21 ساعت
He says triangles come in all shapes and sizes. This is not true. Square is one shape that triangles never come in.
Arturo Viپیش 21 ساعت
Let that sink in!
David Pérez Carballoپیش 21 ساعت
You don't need Math at all to realize that the numbers were wrong. All you need is knowing what a dollar is.
David Pérez Carballoپیش 21 ساعت
If the tweet were right, companies would make marketing campaign based on giving people a million dollars on the condition that they have to spend have of it in the company's products
LygerPlayzپیش 21 ساعت
Mod(12)?
OMEGA MATHپیش 22 ساعت
I calculated it with the calculator of my own making. ^^ The answer is 9.0802224553906177697239317132842877465160463581318973599469359263368451990581536095686676726017686313694209837442655021644539843577857213374531093323093806782573293372726317187667600773452576791006324240319095516079762620676725378525559536273640851402791580794425599672237379642439037399042529558956059140714422722650869273278418038084932628153217412403171786332361209605709367684311051569772... e+??????????? Maybe, my calculator works wrong. ^^ pi^pi^pi^pi exceed the range of my calculator. Because pi^pi^pi^2.64 is 5.945575624748478834163111104201844094426549229357476685150791217078534486839770192701564870908050544430515969374321500160976764790737554881433032777169083085284405550189003842230381499843037006378743383479435985638076988392327668838186887112292990178188467719106000192459038137712735414757695659301329972813480712987286969177891597752626802428019065552265555959967236152100417589714339620107‥‥ e+8035489302 It needs upgrading someday. ^^
William Churcherپیش 22 ساعت
Just thought I would say that at around the 2:30 mark, the irrational numbers are actually called algebraic numbers: roots of an integer-coefficient polynomial. Irrational numbers includes everything that isn't rational, including transcendentals.
Ty Hayterپیش 22 ساعت
"It IS interesting. DO look into it if you're bored" - Matt Parker 2016
Murry Prowseپیش 22 ساعت
Counterpoint: people are just stupid
Octothorpeپیش 22 ساعت
When I clicked I was waiting for the name to be some sort of marketing stunt, like this was the brand name for some sort of soap, I can't think of a time when I've been happier to be wrong.
Andreas Bausپیش 22 ساعت
@ 7:24: did anyone notice that 27182818 are *exactly* the first 8 digits of e? Seems too unlikely to be just a coincidence...
Florian Rudowپیش 22 ساعت
There should be no way to proove this with computers. You need not just enought accuracy for the last integer digit but enought for all following digits as well. This is not possible. It dosn't matter how well you know pi or how jucy your CPUs are.
flyingmobiasپیش 23 ساعت
Incredibly stupid tbh. If a scale showed half the weight and that was used for price calcs, the store management and sellers of said scale would be liable and fired. The question was also framed incorrectly compared to the bs logistics introduced later. Overall 2/10
Rationalپیش 23 ساعت
SPOILER: Formula for number of steps for n rooms! I'm 10 years late to this video, but my answer is "2n-3" nights for an n-room castle.
Benoit Wauteletپیش 23 ساعت
One thing still bugs me though, you said it yourself choosing the statistics to calculate after the event it's very easy to have "impossible" events. It's true that this is a case everyone considers lucky but for a game as complex as Minecraft, there is an astonishing great number of "lucky" cases. Maybe enough to compensate? I have no idea.
Athenriپیش 22 ساعت
These things are corrected for in the original mod paper. Correcting for them, and for the fact that it could have been any speedrunner, yields roughly one in 7.5 trillion.
Finlay Martinsپیش 23 ساعت
If there is anyone I'm going to trust in regards to this controversy, it this guy because not only does he know his stuff but as he mentions, he is completely objective and unbiased
BigMaceپیش 23 ساعت
HE DELETED HIS RESPONSE HAHAHHAHAHA
RWBHereپیش 23 ساعت
At c. 36:00 At Sea Level. But if you're down a mineshaft, or on a hill, things do change. Slightly.
Giovanni Iaquintaپیش 23 ساعت
I've found this, but i don't know how to verify it: π (a^2 + b^2) (1/a + 1/b) ; it's a lot of time i did not do something like this so pls give me opinions, thanks.
The Chemical Workshopپیش 23 ساعت
How about @home computing? Im pretty sure 100k people can do that in half a year.. but then someone gotta write an efficient code
David Ajabaپیش روز
I thought it was much simpler... 😅 I thought they'd just map out the circumference of the country (including the curvature of earth in the findings), find the center of the shape of the country, use the irregular radius (at any point on the circumference of the shape) and the center of the shape to get a scale that maps real world to digital world, then use some fancy integration to find the FLAT surface area... 🤔 Then find some mountains and high terrains, find their area (I would try again how, but too much typing), subtract their flat surface area and add their defined surface area... And bam!! You have yourself the total surface area for a country... 😅
Mayanپیش روز
Why don't we just add the extra time of the length of the year onto the end of the year It gives us time to either celebrate the new year, or procrastinate the new year depending on how things are going.
Alone Starپیش روز
bird
marveratiپیش روز
So, assuming π^π^π^π is in fact an integer... wouldn't that mean we would never be able to prove that by pure computation and a theoretical proof is needed? Also, am I right to assume that there's no particular reason to assume that it should be an integer in the first place? So general consensus is "it most likely isn't because that would just be a huge coincidence" and the crux is that we're just unable to actually tell?
Dr. Weirdپیش روز
This guy watches Summoning Salt i think
Die Würfelschmiedeپیش روز
For sure already mentioned somewhere but I tried on my Casio fx-991ES, same result, but dividing the result by pi gives a floating point number, not a fraction. So the actual result (Ans) when going from that result to the next calculation, seems to be different from what is displayed.
Blasko Sarcevicپیش روز
Get a closer look at Benford's Law. Its not a statement, its a law, for a reason. Dont watch this guy, he doesn't know what hes talking about. You can also say that Biden debunked Benford. That's possible. But not quite.
IShoot TheyScoreپیش 18 ساعت
A Law in maths isn't the same as a law for the physical sciences like Hooke's Law or Boyle's Law. In fact, Benford's Law is known to fail for real world data sets, so don't let the name fool you. I'll just enjoy the irony of you asking people to look closer at Benford's Law when it's clear that you haven't. Did you know for example that beyond the range of magnitudes issue that is detailed in this video, it also tends to only be seen in data that is right-skew?...
Robduino Ashپیش روز
I spent ages trying to reproduce this but couldn't. Then I realised that he's talking about a bug in his particular calculator. WTF should anyone care? That's not a mathematical curiosity.
Nacho TDKپیش روز
But this doesnt answer the lingering question... Why? Why isn't there a compact equation for the perimeter?
Marcel Fransisپیش روز
What about audio?
Mohammad M. Arefپیش روز
According to Matlab, this looks like an integer ending with the last digit to be 7: 2*(pi^pi^pi^pi)
matthewabl nپیش روز
"Guns in the background," "casually racist"...wonder what brand of douches this guy uses.
Brice Parentپیش روز
2π * sqrt((a² + b²) / 2) + 0.446 * (a - b) (found by adjusting the first approximation. It's really close to real value, closer than any of the 3 most common approximation, and it stays really close to real value. At ratio 1:5000, it is still below an error of 1). But I'm no mathematician, I may have made an error somewhere...
Jessemoniumپیش روز
Love the purple
lygophileپیش روز
8:28 you say 13 but you show 11.
Simon Juri Vosbein Nielsenپیش روز
found the dice goblin all the shiny maths rocks all of them
Not Seroshپیش روز
my maths teacher told us to watch this for online school lol
Nicklas Martosپیش روز
The odds of dream getting these key outcomes is as likely as picking the right watermolecule in a glass of water or the right grain of sand in the entire Sahara desert on the first try. Everyone convicted on basis of fingerprints or DNA tests should be released long before we contemplate this level of luck
Adam Hopkinsپیش روز
CPD (craps per decade) my new favorite statistic
Sander Bogaertپیش روز
Matt had hair?
Love Forsbergپیش روز
At 2:20 (or something) you state that irrationals are roots to polynomials. That would be algebraic numbers. Irrational numbers is the complement to rationals.
MinerBatپیش روز
3:30 my headphone is broken at the right side...
animes25پیش روز
blah blah, they dont tell us how to win, waste of time, you are just showing off how you made statistics of monopoly board.
Lord Solarianپیش روز
0:44 dude it's called circumference not perimeter and the equation is πr not 2πr
ThatOneInternetGuyپیش روز
Wait, you're telling me people are arguing over a *fourth place* run? Just have him do it again!
flawedپیش 21 ساعت
he only got fourth place because one of the eyes of ender broke he wouldave gotten first otherwise